From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13967
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Gary Pajer" <pajer@iname.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: another itemize question
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:29:22 -0500
Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl
Message-ID: <002d01c39d57$801dfb70$01fd5644@playroom>
References: <20031009122750.70c366ef.grosso@mail.ru> <6.0.0.22.1.20031009092931.01b4e688@digitpaint.nl> <20031010151534.274f5827.grosso@mail.ru> <6.0.0.22.1.20031010201853.01b37708@digitpaint.nl> <000501c39073$b27581b0$01fd5644@playroom>
Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067348325 26059 80.91.224.253 (28 Oct 2003 13:38:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:38:45 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Tue Oct 28 14:38:43 2003
Return-path: <ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl>
Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl)
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AEU3W-0001X7-00
	for <gctc-ntg-context-518@gmane.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:38:43 +0100
Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4030010AFC; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:38:39 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CB410ADF
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:29:28 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: from playroom (pcp05043536pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net[68.86.253.1])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP
          id <2003102813292201100j08abe>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:29:22 +0000
Original-To: <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl
X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context.ntg.nl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13967
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13967

I continue to have problems understanding itemize.

It seems to me that the 'before' and 'after' keywords used in the third
argument of \setupitemize are operative only if 'columns' are also
specified.  In the example below, the hairlines disappear if the 'columns'
keyword is eliminated.

Feature, bug, or misunderstanding?

BTW:   can the lengths of the two hairlines in this example be made to be
the same length?  What's causing the indentation of the first hairline?

Regards,
Gary

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------

\setupitemize[2][a,packed,columns][before={\hairline},after={\hairline}]
\setupitemize[1][n]

\starttext
\startitemize
%
\item Level One
%
\startitemize
\item first
\item second
\item third
\stopitemize
%
\item Forgot a level
%
\startitemize
\item one
\item two
\item three
\stopitemize
%
\item Level two
%
\startitemize
\item here's one
\item here's another
\item finally this
\stopitemize
%
\stopitemize
%
\stoptext