From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3924
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Giuseppe Bilotta" <oblomov@freemail.it>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: Footnotes in footnotes
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:45:37 +0100
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <002e01c08b08$188d8160$a3ccfea9@nuovo>
References: <3.0.6.32.20010126140527.0156c100@server-1> <3.0.6.32.20010128201353.0093cb40@server-1>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394630 21381 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:37:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:37:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "ConTeXt" <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Original-To: "Hans Hagen" <pragma@wxs.nl>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3924
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3924

Hans Hagen wrote

[about nested footnotes]

>
> Sure, that's one can be solved with one line [just did it].
>
> Till the next update use:
>
> \postponefootnotes\footnote
>

works like a charm :-) but only one level deep (that is, not for footnotes in
footnotes in footnotes ... but who's ever going to use footnotes nested so
deep?)

> in the inner note; this should work ok, although i would certainly try to
> avoid nested notes -)

I would too. But sometimes the need arises; and moreover I'm now typesetting a
little TeX ad, so I want to show some nice features :-)

Giuseppe Bilotta

Using Microsoft products is like having sex
without condoms--but less pleasurable