From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13839
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Pawel Jackowski na Onet" <jackos1@poczta.onet.pl>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: Re: uncompatibility?
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:36:55 +0200
Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl
Message-ID: <006801c392ac$16a702a0$1c00a8c0@best>
References: <000801c38fc9$62d41310$0500a8c0@best> <m21xtkm97g.fsf@levana.de> <6.0.0.22.2.20031011113317.023694c0@localhost> <001901c3900d$6cc9e090$0500a8c0@best> <6.0.0.22.2.20031014215123.02d27ac0@localhost>
Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1066175145 19409 80.91.224.253 (14 Oct 2003 23:45:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 23:45:45 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Wed Oct 15 01:45:44 2003
Return-path: <ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl>
Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl)
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A9YrI-00013l-00
	for <gctc-ntg-context-518@gmane.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:45:44 +0200
Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4477D10B68; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:45:42 +0200 (MEST)
Original-Received: from smtp5.poczta.onet.pl (smtp5.poczta.onet.pl [213.180.130.32])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C25410B43
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:38:13 +0200 (MEST)
Original-Received: from pa36.debniki.sdi.tpnet.pl ([213.77.147.36]:16900 "HELO best")
	by ps5.test.onet.pl with SMTP id <S1108738AbTJNXh2>;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:37:28 +0200
Original-To: <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl
X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context.ntg.nl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13839
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13839

Problem: a (very) different ConTeXt versions and a different output

From: "Hans Hagen" <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:52 PM


> At 17:36 11/10/2003, you wrote:
>
> >Lets consider the following code:
> >
> >\setupitemize[4,packed]
> >\starttext
> >\startitemize[n]
> >  \item one
> >  \item two
> >  \item three
> >\stopitemize
> >\stoptext
> >
> >The problem is that in newer installation, default itemize style (meaning
> >packed, with triangle symbol) IS FORCED instead of style given direclty
> >(just numbering). The older one do what I would expect; numbered style
has a
>
> hm, i'll look into it; it's probably related to the fact that last year
> itemize became definable and retaining downward compatibility for the
> \setupitemize command was tricky

Thanks in advance. The simplest way to customize that code to suit the fresh
context versions is to comment first line, so I can live with it.




Pawe/l