From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2494 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Frans Goddijn" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: meandering paths and names Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:35:44 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <007001c00850$83f5bde0$b105703e@pandora.be> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393283 9311 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:14:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2494 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2494 Hello, while installing TeX (Perl, ConTeXt, PDFtex et cetera) on this new machine I am surprised by lots of little details that are somewhat confusing. The *.enc files for instance are in \texmf\pdftex\base on my original machine, but on this new machine they are on \texmf\dvips\base will mktexlsr make sure that the files are found anyway? Also, in the installation manual for ConTeXt I read that I can change cont-sys.tex but then I discover that this file was named cont_sys.tex on my original system, with a bunch of other files in a directory with the underscore in the filename instead of the -dash. On the new machine, after installing ConTeXt, not one file with the name cont-sys.tex is found. Is it normal for a "virgin" ConTeXt system not to have the con-sys.tex or cont_sys.tex file and does it matter if it's a _ or - in the filename? Groet! Frans frans@goddijn.com www.goddijn.com tel NL 0621-815 881 fax: 026-3211759 Postbus 30196 6803 AD Arnhem NL