From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/11046 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Willi Egger" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: footnote control Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:24:53 +0100 Organization: BOEDE Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <007401c2d46f$84e9ac00$0100a8c0@vademecum> References: Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045257863 14349 80.91.224.249 (14 Feb 2003 21:24:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18jnJl-0003j5-00 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:24:21 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C2810AE9; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:26:37 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.139]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B855210AE7 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:24:56 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from vademecum (a80-126-172-1.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.126.172.1]) by smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with SMTP id h1ELOtWt085161 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:24:56 +0100 (CET) Original-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:11046 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:11046 Hi Bruce, I don't know. - I tested with cmr and cmss only. I found it strange though, that \switchtobodyfont[Serif] did not result into what I thought it should! Sorry, Willi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce D'Arcus" To: Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [NTG-context] footnote control > > Yes this works (well, the ss doesn't, but that's probably because of > something with my typescript). > > So the question is, what does this tell me about specifying the > footnote font? Or in more general terms, what if I wanted -- for some > reason -- to use the sans italic font for the footnote marker? Am just > not understanding the logic of font selection here (obviously!). Do I > need to do some funky \definetypeface command? > > Bruce > > On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 03:00 PM, Willi Egger wrote: > > > Hi Bruce, > >> Thanks Willi! Here's what happens though (am just pasting the part > >> that seems relevant): > > > > Sorry, I see that my idea was not helping that much. > > What after testing works here is the following > > > > \def\FootnoteNumber% > > {\switchtobodyfont[ss,16pt]} > > > > \setupfootnotes[numbercommand=\FootnoteNumber] > > \setupfootnotedefinition > > [after=\blank, > > style={\switchtobodyfont[rm]}] > > > > Willi > > _______________________________________________ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context >