From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2545
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Frans Goddijn" <frans@iaf.nl>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: oldstyle footnotemarks
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:34:41 +0200
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <008201c00e99$90b17cf0$a77c2ed5@arnhem.chello.nl>
References: <3.0.6.32.20000825122259.017e8c90@pop.wxs.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393332 9774 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:15:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:15:32 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: "ntg-context" <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2545
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2545

Hans wrote:

> I will add in the next release:
>
> \defineconversion[o][\oldstylenumerals]
>
> \def\oldstylenumerals#1{{\os\number#1}}

does this mean that I could also copy these commands now into my document
and make them work? I tried to guess what the dutch equivalents would be
and tried them, but it seems that teX just ignores that, at least only the
usual numbers are used, only tnr.pfb is used and nothing from tnrexp.pfb
...

By the way, is it best to use the English ConTeXt if I want to remain in
touch with the latest tricks?

Groet!

Frans