From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/1256
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Berend de Boer" <berend@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: RE: Expand cont-ger.tex
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 20:23:15 +0100
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <00ae01bf2f9e$de183590$0321a8c0@bmach.nederware.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035392086 31158 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:54:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:54:46 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:1256
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:1256

> If I would make it default
> for dutch, it could break existing documents with normal "'s.
> Although, as long as one never uses " '' `` but \quote and
> \quotation instead, making " active is pretty safe.

What do people on this list think? I've used it for a few days now, and are
quite happy with it (now if I only could get the emacs spelling mode to
recognize "e life would be perfect).

Groetjes,

Berend. (-: