From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13429 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Willi Egger" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: strange tabulate Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:26:14 +0200 Organization: BOEDE Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <00b401c38137$2aa86810$0100a8c0@vademecum> References: Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1064255991 20682 80.91.224.253 (22 Sep 2003 18:39:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Mon Sep 22 20:39:48 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A1VbA-0001PK-00 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:39:48 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E2F10B98; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:39:46 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.137]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A3A10B49 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:27:25 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from vademecum (a80-126-172-1.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.126.172.1]) by smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h8MIRN4j046402 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:27:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13429 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13429 Hi Patrick > The first tabulate gives me rules, the second does not. Which would > not harm if this is documented. But in the MAPS article mentioned > recently and in the up-to-date the examples clearly show that \HL > should give me a horizontal line. What is going on? > > > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > \starttext > \starttabulate[|l|p|] > \HR > \NC small \NC They say, small is beautiful. \NC \NR > \HR > \NC medium \NC It seems that the medium is the message. \NC \NR > \HR > \NC large \NC Large T||shirts are always sold out. \NC \NR > \HR > \stoptabulate > > \starttabulate[|l|p|] > \HL > \NC small \NC They say, small is beautiful. \NC \NR > \HL > \NC medium \NC It seems that the medium is the message. \NC \NR > \HL > \NC large \NC Large T||shirts are always sold out. \NC \NR > \HL > \stoptabulate > \stoptext > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% I tried your example and indeed there are no horizontal lines in the second tabulate. - I checked then may latest document, where I have such tabulations included. And indeed there are no horizontal lines too. The mentioned document was compiled on 19-09-2003 before the update to the latest beta version on 20-09-2003. - Unnoticed this problem was already present in the previous beta-version. Willi