Re: Symbol for the unit litre (was: \usemodule[units])

["Willi Egger" <w.egger@xs4all.nl>]

Hans,

It sounds as it is a question of taste. - To my taste I would be happy with
a 'l' because when you write 'mL' it is pritty strange to read. - I do hope,
that readers who encounter 'ml' are aware of the text they read. - Finally
we should not concentrate on the DAU (Der Dümmste Anzunehmende User).

Willi

----- Original Message -----
From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: Eckhart Guthöhrlein <eckhart.guthoehrlein@uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: Symbol for the unit litre (was: \usemodule[units])

> So, given the replies, i think that we should change the "L" into "l";
user
> can remap this to $el$ if needed; an alternative is to use a symbol liter,
> that then can be redefined.
>
> ok?
>
> Hans
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                    Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl
>                        Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>   tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                    fall-back web server:
> www.pragma-pod.nl
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>