From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2296
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Berend de Boer" <berend@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: RE: A proposal for texexec
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:40:40 +0200
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <00fc01bfd5ec$fc800630$0321a8c0@bmach.nederware.nl>
References: <87bt0z0z2p.fsf@localhost.localnet>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393085 7674 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:11:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:11:25 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
In-Reply-To: <87bt0z0z2p.fsf@localhost.localnet>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2296
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2296

> I think that it would be trivial to implement (there already is
> --result option for texexec).

Or fix the viewers :-) They should attempt to open the file for exclusive
use or with deny write or something like that: if not possible the file is
not yet ready. These viewers are too greedy.

Groetjes,

Berend. (-: