From: Berend de Boer <berend@pobox.com>
Subject: Footnote rules
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 19:32:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01BDBB27.AD827A90.berend@pobox.com> (raw)
Hai All,
What rules does context use in setting footnotes? In a \startopsomming
.\stopopsomming I've used two footnotes. This construction is printed at
the bottom of the page. For two footnotes doesn't seem to be enough space.
Context moves both footnotes to the next page.
I would have expected that at least one footnote remained at the first
page. But maybe it's more logical to have consecutive footnotes together.
Footnotes will be removed from this document (they just serve as temporary
comments not to forget things...), but I was wondering what algorithm
context uses.
Groetjes,
Berend.
next reply other threads:[~1998-07-29 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-07-29 17:32 Berend de Boer [this message]
1998-07-30 7:22 Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01BDBB27.AD827A90.berend@pobox.com \
--to=berend@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).