From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/166 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Berend de Boer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: RE: footnotes disappear in floating tables Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 14:36:53 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <01BDF392.42D21180.berend@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391036 21747 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:37:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "'ntg-context@ntg.nl'" Original-To: "'Hans Hagen'" Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:166 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:166 On Friday, October 09, 1998 3:19 PM, Hans Hagen [SMTP:pragma@wxs.nl] wrote: > Why not use local footnotes, i.e. attach them to the table? See > core-not.tex and yell to me if you got problems. Yeah, in the mean time I did detect them. Looks nice (try to do that with Word??). > Footnotes is inconvenient anyway. I think I can work out a floating > footnote, but I'm not sure if that always will work ok with breaking > pages. A shortcoming of TeX? I lately looked in the mark mechanism, that should be able to do that, but it seemed a bit limited. Will some newer TeX be able to do this? Groetjes, Berend.