From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/7518
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Patrick Gundlach <pg@levana.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: fonts/tetex
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 20:35:15 +0200
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <02040320351501.02411@levana>
References: <5.1.0.14.1.20020330135510.0358cdd0@server-1> <02040314395101.00944@levana> <200204031654.g33Gspl01274@nathir.fiee.lan>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035397975 19849 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:32:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:32:55 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
In-Reply-To: <200204031654.g33Gspl01274@nathir.fiee.lan>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:7518
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:7518

Hello Henning,

> > sure I did :) There is a mapping to upl*, none to ppl
>
> What's wrong with it?
not very much... it just won't work :)

> upl are (free) URW Palladio, ppl are (expensive) Adobe Palatino.
not really. On my two tetex installations, when I as the dvi driver for a 
pplr* font, it is the URW variant. It should be uplr* but it isn't. Don't 
konw where this comes from.

> Why there should be a mapping for a font that "nobody" has, at least
> legally?
I don't know who made the psfonts.map /pdftex.map file.

[...]

>   \definefontsynonym[Palatino-Roman]		[\defaultencoding-por]
> [encoding=\defaultencoding]
>   \definefontsynonym[Palatino-Italic]		[\defaultencoding-poi]

[...]

that is something I want to avoid: reinstalling the font again and again.

-- 
Viele Grüße, 

    Patrick Gundlach