From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/5547 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Frans Goddijn" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Acrobat viewer and A4 Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 21:49:49 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <029801c1389f$7f903fc0$6501a8c0@lap> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0295_01C138B0.2F076D60" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035396133 2614 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:02:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: "NTG-ConTeXt mailing list" Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:5547 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:5547 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0295_01C138B0.2F076D60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When I view my document using Acrobat, the footer looks 10mm closer to = the bottom of the page than it actually is in print. Is Acrobat known to be less than accurate in paper proportion or should = I look for an explanation elsewhere? Groet! Frans ------=_NextPart_000_0295_01C138B0.2F076D60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

When I view my document using Acrobat, the = footer looks=20 10mm closer to the bottom of the page than it actually is in = print.

Is Acrobat known to be less than accurate in = paper=20 proportion or should I look for an explanation elsewhere?

Groet!

Frans

------=_NextPart_000_0295_01C138B0.2F076D60--