Re: next beta

[Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>]

On 6/17/2017 3:48 PM, Jeong Dal wrote:
> Dear Hans,
> 
> I updated ConTeXt beta today and run your sample for long formula.
> It works nice and it is the feature what many math people want I think.
> Thank you for your concern.
> 
> One thing that I’d like say is that a new line in the splitted long formula usually starts with operations in many math books.
> But, in the ourput  of your example, every line ends with ‘+’ sign and begin a new line with a ‘number’.
> 
> Would you please check it once more?
this is how tex works: just look at inline math

i played with it a bit but had to adapt the engine for a bit more 
control (stepwise the matyh machinery is opened up i.e. hard coded steps 
become configureable)

anyway, the question is not implementing but control: it's not default 
tex behaviour so it has to be turned on (and then after a while we 
forget that it can be turned on i guess)

(no clue what keyword to use for controling it)

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________