From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/63734 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Schuster Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Defining a command for enumeration+block Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:49:31 +0100 Message-ID: <062CAB94-2465-46B8-AB9E-916A4A5D4679@gmail.com> References: <7DC6D248-BBC3-4A2B-B3D2-14E1D791D480@emsolutions.com.au> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1371429836==" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290185271 32422 80.91.229.12 (19 Nov 2010 16:47:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:47:51 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Nov 19 17:47:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJU7g-00026V-HA for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:47:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E28CA868; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:47:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SMIcS7OypIul; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:47:36 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C630ECA860; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:47:36 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D900FCA860 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:47:34 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id OV5e+m64p3SW for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:47:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter4-til.mf.surf.net (filter4-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.220]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF90CA85A for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:47:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com (mail-bw0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) by filter4-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id oAJGlH0I009251 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:47:18 +0100 Original-Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so4223443bwz.14 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:47:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:mime-version :content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to:references:message-id :x-mailer; bh=WWFXOiSsG8RD5tBvpher/GAX5gB7rD2rdrquOxOfvP8=; b=MGUOKCM+HoA//x7XOeC1FxkIRdCV2rqaB5fnd8EPCv6mHReRLWmtqzISDPKx/W3DMq WyBqhhLw45CijkreBjpad6eUAplU5ZsU2MKp5dnO/cD/mYt8bleoArQrbixCq7i7LdjU vPebHRehNSGogcvk/xif/8213Z7YzvJY2br44= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to :references:message-id:x-mailer; b=RimY7xNSaCDKwapitBkZ/NLVu1a9j+5kWQApzoBZ4Z7FvcQBy+9m4AYL4HFTKcDvyy ZJBGv9SBDP6TuIwEF31+iJS5yOvzCOerc7hScc9f7GkZYsEDRaqcoesl12+HzZ96OvpT u1m45Ig0SoKqLNgUAoaQbg1MXgiNWJbp2u90Y= Original-Received: by 10.204.122.11 with SMTP id j11mr2265821bkr.171.1290185237641; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:47:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.2.23] (p5B293164.dip.t-dialin.net [91.41.49.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f21sm963992bkf.0.2010.11.19.08.47.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:47:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7DC6D248-BBC3-4A2B-B3D2-14E1D791D480@emsolutions.com.au> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=209.85.214.41; country=US; region=CA; city=Mountain View; postalcode=94043; latitude=37.4192; longitude=-122.0574; metrocode=807; areacode=650; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.4192,-122.0574&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 05Dx4Lhz8 - ad832d41e270 - 20101119 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.220 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:63734 Archived-At: --===============1371429836== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-489443064 --Apple-Mail-1-489443064 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Am 19.11.2010 um 05:43 schrieb Glen Callaghan: >=20 >=20 >>> Interestingly though, the formatting is slightly different between = defining the blocks and using (recalling) the blocks. When I recall the = blocks, the text appears a line below the enumeration labels (see = example + attachment below). >>=20 >> I can reproduce this but for mkiv (context ) the output in both = cases is the same. >=20 > Wolfgang >=20 > Weird... when I try it here on mkiv, there is no output where I define = the blocks (see attachment). =20 >=20 > I'm trying this on the "current" mimimals (downloaded today) on mac os = x (10.6.5). > [LuaTeX beta-0.64.0-2010111215, ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 MKIV = fmt: 2010.11.19] >=20 > Could this be some sort of bug? Is there anything you'd like me to = try. With MkIV blocks are hidden by default while MkII prints them, add = \keepblocks[Block] to your document and the blocks will appear. You can also use the same = name for the blocks as you do use the enumerations, to allow this blocks use = begin/end commands and not the usual start/stop commands. Wolfgang --Apple-Mail-1-489443064 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
I can reproduce this but for mkiv (context <file>) = the output in both cases is the same.

Weird... when I try it = here on mkiv, there is no output where I define the blocks (see = attachment).  

I'm trying this on the "current" mimimals (downloaded = today) on mac os x (10.6.5).
[LuaTeX
Could this be some sort of = bug?  Is there anything you'd like me to = try.

With MkIV = blocks are hidden by default while MkII prints them, = add \keepblocks[Block]
to your document and the blocks = will appear. You can also use the same name for the
blocks as = you do use the enumerations, to allow this blocks use = begin/end commands
and not the usual start/stop = commands.

Wolfgang


= --Apple-Mail-1-489443064-- --===============1371429836== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ --===============1371429836==--