I find this setup stuff bewildering. My last posting is concerning the typesetting of the endnote numbering in both the text and the list at the en dof the chapter. In the Reference Manual both textcommand and numbercommand are treated in the same setup macro: \setupfootnotes on page 94. But (with the help of your reply) I find now there are different macros needed to set them up:

Needed for the text = \setupnotes[endnote][textcommand=\hifnmarker]
Needed for the list = \setupnotation[endnote][numbercommand=\fnmarker]
\def\fnmarker#1{[#1]}\def\hifnmarker#1{\high{[#1]}}

Wolfgang Schuster just comes up with a similar solution:
\setupnote    [endnote][textcommand=\groupedcommand{[}{]}]
\setupnotation[endnote][numbercommand=\groupedcommand{[}{]}]
Allthough the difference between \setupnote and \setupnotes alludes me.

The \setupnotes does not handle the numbercommand, the \setupnotation does not handle the textcommand. I find this split in behaviour difficult to understand. May I plead for a unification here?

Hans van der Meer



On 17 Apr 2013, at 8:14 PM, Marco Patzer <homerow@lavabit.com<mailto:homerow@lavabit.com>>
 wrote:

On 2013–04–17 Meer, H. van der wrote:

Is there a reason why the first does switches off the rule above the footnote
 \setupfootnotes[rule=off]
but this doesn't?
 \setupnotation[footnote][rule=off]]

It's \setupnotes, not \setupnotation that controls the rule.

\setupnotes
 [footnote]
 [rule=off]

\starttext
Some footnote\footnote{The foonote}.\crlf
\stoptext

Marco
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl<mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl> / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________