From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/23985 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans van der Meer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: bimath vs bfmath Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:47:48 +0100 Message-ID: <0C3C416A-BA41-47AA-810F-7C3759D63BEC@science.uva.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133529747 27439 80.91.229.2 (2 Dec 2005 13:22:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Dec 02 14:22:26 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiArA-0001UI-7n for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 14:21:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3820F128A7; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:19:34 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11176-01-74; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:19:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245701284D; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:16:15 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3F7127C3 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:16:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10469-01-37 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:16:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp.science.uva.nl (smtp.science.uva.nl [146.50.4.84]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E9912884 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 17:01:30 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from 119-24.uva.surfnetthuis.nl [145.98.119.24] by smtp.science.uva.nl with ESMTP (sendmail 8.11.6p2/config 11.36). id jB1Fv9v16377; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:57:09 +0100 X-Organisation: Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands X-URL: http://www.science.uva.nl/ Original-To: NTG ConTeXt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:23985 Archived-At: Why does $\bfmath a \rightarrow b$ % b-f-math behaves different from $\bimath a \rightarrow b$ % b-i-math In the first I get a bold arrow, not in the second one. In bfmath the symbol font switches to bold, but in bimath it does not. The variables do change correctly to bolditalic in both cases.. Is the symbolfont in the mathfamilies not switched in \bimath? For the font (Lucida) I have normal and bold symbol definitions installed: sy=MathSymbol mo 1, \definefontsynonym [MathSymbol] [LucidaNewMath-Symbol] sybf=MathSymbolBold mo 1, \definefontsynonym [MathSymbolBold] [LucidaNewMath-Symbol-Demi] I did set \setupformulas[method=bold] in the preamble and verified that \boldfacemathmethod has the value 1. Inspection of font-bfm.tex did not give me the solution. I must confess being lost here. As an aside another observation with bold math. After: \setupformulas[method=bold] \startformula[method=bold]\bfm .... the call to \bfm makes \quad's in the math disappear (using lucidabright font setup) And in the default font (no fontsetting) \bfm even gives an error ! \textfont 7 is undefined (character !). \stopdisplaymath ->\stopinnermath $$ \ifgridsnapping \egroup \afterdisplayspa... yours sincerely, dr. H. van der Meer