From: Otared Kavian <otared@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: lower superscripts in MkIV -- too low?
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 08:17:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0CC44EA5-F317-4D1B-B481-BD2C91EF6692@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mwgjbjdw.fsf@approx.mit.edu>
Hi Sanjoy,
I agree with you to say that the position of subscripts and superscripts in mkiv is not perfect: the same remark applies to the position of the derivative sign « prime » as $u’(t)$.
Actually in mkii (and also in plain TeX) the positions of the superscripts in your example are the same, but this is not the case with subscripts:
$x_{3}\ x\mathstrut_{3}$
that is in mkii the latter $x\mathstrut_{3}$ gives a lower subscript, while in plain TeX both subscripts are positioned at an identical depth.
I would say the position of subscripts and superscripts in mkiv should be identical with one gets with the latest beta (version 2014.03.20 16:59) in the following example
\starttext
$x\mathstrut_{3}$ and $x\mathstrut^{3}$
\stoptext
However as Hans pointed out, regarding maths typesetting in mkiv there are also some font related issues.
Best regards: OK
On 21 mars 2014, at 17:34, Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@mit.edu> wrote:
> Dear math typesetting aficianados,
>
> In the following example,
>
> \starttext
> $x^3\ x\mathstrut^3$
> \stoptext
>
> the superscript without the strut is about 2pt lower than with the
> strut, using MkIV. With MkII or plain TeX, they are the same height
> (at the higher position obtained by using the \mathstrut in MkIV).
>
> My eye tells me that the higher position looks more right. Do others
> agree? Or, if it's a matter of taste, is the difference configurable
> so that one can get the MkII behavior even without the \mathstrut?
>
> --
> -Sanjoy
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-22 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-21 16:34 Sanjoy Mahajan
2014-03-22 7:17 ` Otared Kavian [this message]
2014-03-22 14:29 ` Hans Hagen
2014-03-23 1:12 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2014-03-28 12:21 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0CC44EA5-F317-4D1B-B481-BD2C91EF6692@gmail.com \
--to=otared@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).