Re: formatting \note output

[Alan Bowen <acbowen@princeton.edu>]

Brooks and Christopher—

Many thanks for your help! \in is just what I wanted, and \in{ref.} 
[lemur] works perfectly.

All best, Alan


On Sep 22, 2005, at 4:58 PM, Brooks Moses wrote:

> At 04:18 AM 9/22/2005, Alan Bowen <acbowen@Princeton.EDU> wrote:
>
>> Though I have asked this question before and there was no response, I
>> thought I would ask the following once more (before going through my
>> source files and making the changes by hand).
>>
>> Does anyone know how to modify or adapt \note so that the output is a
>> footnote number in normal/body text format---e.g., "(ref.\ \note  
>> [lemur])" becomes "(ref.\ 9)"---rather than a superscripted numeral?
>>
>
> As I noted on the Wiki's footnotes page when I discovered this,  
> \note is basically equivalent to the standard \in function for  
> accessing references, except that it typesets the result as a  
> superscript.
>
> Thus, you can use \in rather than \note to reference a footnote  
> number in normal format -- e.g., "(ref.\ \in[lemur])", for your  
> example, though using "(\in{ref.}[lemur])" will do a better job  
> with any hyperlinks, since the word "ref." will be included in the  
> hyperlink.  And, if for some bizarre reason you want to reference a  
> section number by setting it as a superscript, you can use \note  
> instead of \in for that.
>
> - Brooks
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>