bfmath in nath

bfmath in nath

[David Munger]

Hello,


The following outputs a nice bold displayed omega (the first one), and  
a thin normal inline one (the second one):

\usemodule [nath]
\setupbodyfont [12pt]
\definebodyfont [12pt] [mm] [mibf=cmmib10 sa 1]
\starttext
\[\bfmath \omega\] $\bfmath \omega$
\stoptext

Note that replacing nath with amsl in \usemodule[nath] results in two  
bold omegas, so the problem has to be in t-nath.tex.

Btw, this nath module is very useful to me. If I'd be able to do some  
debugging into it, I sure would. Could you please point me to some  
ConTeXt hacking references?


Thanks in advance,


David

Re: bfmath in nath

[Gary Pajer]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Munger" <mungerd@users.sourceforge.net>

> bold omegas, so the problem has to be in t-nath.tex.
>
> Btw, this nath module is very useful to me. If I'd be able to do some
> debugging into it, I sure would. Could you please point me to some
> ConTeXt hacking references?

Ditto.  I'd be willing to do some debugging as well... maybe some of us
could informally try to smooth it out.

-gary

Re: bfmath in nath

[Giuseppe Bilotta]

Tuesday, February 17, 2004 David Munger wrote:

> Hello,


> The following outputs a nice bold displayed omega (the first one), and
> a thin normal inline one (the second one):

> \usemodule [nath]
> \setupbodyfont [12pt]
> \definebodyfont [12pt] [mm] [mibf=cmmib10 sa 1]
> \starttext
> \[\bfmath \omega\] $\bfmath \omega$
> \stoptext

> Note that replacing nath with amsl in \usemodule[nath] results in two
> bold omegas, so the problem has to be in t-nath.tex.

> Btw, this nath module is very useful to me. If I'd be able to do some
> debugging into it, I sure would. Could you please point me to some
> ConTeXt hacking references?

Ok, I'll keep this too for my todo on my next recheck of nath
(I really have too many things in my hands these days ...)

Anyway, ConTeXt hacking will only partially help you, since
nath contains a lot of LaTeX-imported code.

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta