From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/14772 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: bfmath in nath Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:33:36 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <1002455188.20040219183336@iol.it> References: <20040217205408.GA19808@tempete.lac.qc.ca> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1077211681 18750 80.91.224.253 (19 Feb 2004 17:28:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Thu Feb 19 18:27:43 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Atrxe-0000Cj-00 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:27:42 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0925C10B3F; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:25:53 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mbox.dmi.unict.it (mbox.dmi.unict.it [151.97.252.66]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3D510B3F for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:24:07 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from oblomov.dipmat.unict.it (oblomov.dipmat.unict.it [151.97.252.27]) by mbox.dmi.unict.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC091C6F05 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:44:24 +0100 (CET) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <20040217205408.GA19808@tempete.lac.qc.ca> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:14772 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:14772 Tuesday, February 17, 2004 David Munger wrote: > Hello, > The following outputs a nice bold displayed omega (the first one), and > a thin normal inline one (the second one): > \usemodule [nath] > \setupbodyfont [12pt] > \definebodyfont [12pt] [mm] [mibf=cmmib10 sa 1] > \starttext > \[\bfmath \omega\] $\bfmath \omega$ > \stoptext > Note that replacing nath with amsl in \usemodule[nath] results in two > bold omegas, so the problem has to be in t-nath.tex. > Btw, this nath module is very useful to me. If I'd be able to do some > debugging into it, I sure would. Could you please point me to some > ConTeXt hacking references? Ok, I'll keep this too for my todo on my next recheck of nath (I really have too many things in my hands these days ...) Anyway, ConTeXt hacking will only partially help you, since nath contains a lot of LaTeX-imported code. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta