* bfmath in nath
@ 2004-02-17 20:54 David Munger
2004-02-18 2:50 ` Gary Pajer
2004-02-19 17:33 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Munger @ 2004-02-17 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello,
The following outputs a nice bold displayed omega (the first one), and
a thin normal inline one (the second one):
\usemodule [nath]
\setupbodyfont [12pt]
\definebodyfont [12pt] [mm] [mibf=cmmib10 sa 1]
\starttext
\[\bfmath \omega\] $\bfmath \omega$
\stoptext
Note that replacing nath with amsl in \usemodule[nath] results in two
bold omegas, so the problem has to be in t-nath.tex.
Btw, this nath module is very useful to me. If I'd be able to do some
debugging into it, I sure would. Could you please point me to some
ConTeXt hacking references?
Thanks in advance,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: bfmath in nath
2004-02-17 20:54 bfmath in nath David Munger
@ 2004-02-18 2:50 ` Gary Pajer
2004-02-19 17:33 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gary Pajer @ 2004-02-18 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Munger" <mungerd@users.sourceforge.net>
> bold omegas, so the problem has to be in t-nath.tex.
>
> Btw, this nath module is very useful to me. If I'd be able to do some
> debugging into it, I sure would. Could you please point me to some
> ConTeXt hacking references?
Ditto. I'd be willing to do some debugging as well... maybe some of us
could informally try to smooth it out.
-gary
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: bfmath in nath
2004-02-17 20:54 bfmath in nath David Munger
2004-02-18 2:50 ` Gary Pajer
@ 2004-02-19 17:33 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Bilotta @ 2004-02-19 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
Tuesday, February 17, 2004 David Munger wrote:
> Hello,
> The following outputs a nice bold displayed omega (the first one), and
> a thin normal inline one (the second one):
> \usemodule [nath]
> \setupbodyfont [12pt]
> \definebodyfont [12pt] [mm] [mibf=cmmib10 sa 1]
> \starttext
> \[\bfmath \omega\] $\bfmath \omega$
> \stoptext
> Note that replacing nath with amsl in \usemodule[nath] results in two
> bold omegas, so the problem has to be in t-nath.tex.
> Btw, this nath module is very useful to me. If I'd be able to do some
> debugging into it, I sure would. Could you please point me to some
> ConTeXt hacking references?
Ok, I'll keep this too for my todo on my next recheck of nath
(I really have too many things in my hands these days ...)
Anyway, ConTeXt hacking will only partially help you, since
nath contains a lot of LaTeX-imported code.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-19 17:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-17 20:54 bfmath in nath David Munger
2004-02-18 2:50 ` Gary Pajer
2004-02-19 17:33 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).