From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9628 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[2]: [NTG-context] Gamma support in TeXExec? Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:33:35 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.vet.uu.nl Message-ID: <10298650241.20021022113335@iol.it> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021021085206.02ecf2a8@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021020184536.00afa6e0@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021020184536.00afa6e0@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021021085206.02ecf2a8@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021022101312.02d88548@server-1> Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035399929 4606 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 19:05:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-Received: from hermes.hrz.uni-giessen.de (hermes.hrz.uni-giessen.de [134.176.2.15]) by osiris.hrz.uni-giessen.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9M9ade10037 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:36:39 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl by hermes.hrz.uni-giessen.de with ESMTP for Guenter.Partosch@hrz.uni-giessen.de; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:36:23 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D050610AE2; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:36:18 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from smtp3.libero.it (smtp3.libero.it [193.70.192.127]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7155710ADE for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:35:06 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from [151.29.128.225] (151.29.128.225) by smtp3.libero.it (6.5.028) id 3DA3111B006849A5; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:35:01 +0200 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20021022101312.02d88548@server-1> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.vet.uu.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9628 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9628 Tuesday, October 22, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote: HH> tex -> fmt HH> etec -> efmt (already) HH> pdftex -> pft HH> pdfetex -> epmt HH> omega -> oft HH> eomega -> eoft HH> nts -> nfmt (already) HH> but since pdftex is compatible is less urgent since it's efmt and nfmt, wouldn't consistency call for pfmt, ofmt, eofmt, pefmt ? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context