From: David Munger <mungerd@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: How to \bf for math?
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:10:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1140207042.79639.11.camel@tempete> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F62A52.7090105@comp.lancs.ac.uk>
Adam Lindsay wrote :
> David Munger wrote:
> > Adam Lindsay wrote :
> >> David Munger wrote:
> >>> Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman
> >>> characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is
> >>> still the hbox wrapper.
> >> Okay.
> >> What do you mean by "can't get roman characters"? Can you give an
> >> minimal example?
> >>
> >> adam
> >
> > Sorry, I should have given one.
> >
> > \startmathcollection[default]
> > \definemathcharacter [a] [nothing] [mi] ["61]
> > \stopmathcollection
> >
> > \definetypeface [] [mm] [bfmath] [computer-modern] [computer-modern]
> > \setupformulas [method=bold]
> >
> > \starttext
> > \formula{a, {\rm a}, {\bfm a}, {\bfm\rm a}}
> > \stoptext
> >
> > I can't get bold roman math. And by using [mr] instead of [mi]:
> > \definemathcharacter [a] [nothing] [mr] ["61]
> > one gets the inverse problem: no more bold math italic.
>
> oh, I see. I'll admit: all the maths I've dealt with don't require such
> fine manual control over the fonts.
Well, sometimes it's useful when dealing with different kinds of objects
such as vectors and tensors.
> Would it be for individual characters? Would an approach like this work?
> \formula{a, {\rm a}, {\bfm a}, \text{\bf a}}
Yes, of course. This happens to be an \hbox. My point is simply that we
have not come to a general solution yet, we are just finding different
workarounds to suit our personal needs, which is not bad indeed.
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-17 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-15 11:07 Mojca Miklavec
2006-01-15 12:48 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2006-01-15 14:59 ` Mojca Miklavec
2006-01-15 18:11 ` Hans Hagen
2006-01-16 11:06 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-01-16 17:08 ` Mojca Miklavec
2006-01-16 17:59 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-02-16 20:20 ` Adam Lindsay
2006-02-16 20:40 ` Adam Lindsay
2006-02-17 10:36 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-02-17 17:24 ` David Munger
2006-02-17 18:23 ` Adam Lindsay
2006-02-17 19:09 ` David Munger
2006-02-17 19:56 ` Adam Lindsay
2006-02-17 20:10 ` David Munger [this message]
2006-02-17 21:37 ` Hans Hagen
2006-02-18 11:56 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-01-16 17:26 ` Mojca Miklavec
2006-01-16 18:00 ` David Munger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1140207042.79639.11.camel@tempete \
--to=mungerd@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).