Re: an encoding for turkish

["Wolfgang Schuster" <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1153 bytes --]

2006/10/11, R. Ermers <r.ermers@hccnet.nl>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am preparing a document in xml docbook. The general output  with
> Context is fine.
>
> However, in my main text (Dutch) I use some Turkish as well. Next to the
> xml-editor, I use Textpad, whose unicode support is not optimal, so  for
> the time being I save the file in iso 8859-9. This encoding is identical
> to latin-1, but with the 6 symbols ETH, eth, THORN, thorn, Yacute,
> yacute replaced by Gbreve, gbreve, Scedilla, scedilla, Idotabove,
> dotlessi (see e.g. http://www.gar.no/home/mats/8859-9.htm).
>
> Now I can't figure out which encoding to use in my Context document (I
> also considered using a code in the xml, but that is not a very
> attractive idea). Do we need to set up a separate coding for Turkish
> (like for Polish, Slowak and Romanian)?
>
> The next step will be to
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert



Hi Robert,

se easiest way would be to save your document in unicode-encoding
and process it with \enableregime[utf] in ConTeXt.

I use Textpad sometimes by myslf, but I prefer emeditor because it support
more encodings and has built-in syntax hyghligting for TeX.

Wolfgang

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1647 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context