From: "Wolfgang Schuster" <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>
To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of framed text
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:19:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <115224fb0802210019k4302ef5cl11d86d520d2f00cd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0802202201520.4562@nqv-yncgbc>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In core-rul.tex we have
>
> %D We define the general (and original) case by just saying:
> \defineframedtext[\v!framedtext]
This defines
\startframedtext ... \stopframedtext and \framedtext{...}
> This gives strange user behavior. Consider the following
>
> \defineframedtext[test][width=broad]
>
> \showframe
> \starttext
>
> \starttest
> \input tufte
> \stoptest
>
> \startframedtext[test]
> \input tufte
> \stopframedtext
This should be:
\dostartframedtext[test]
...
\dostopframedtext
The "[test]" is interpreted as optional argument for the predefined
\startframedtext ... \stopframedtext environment.
> \stoptext
>
> The two framedtext have different widths. Why not say
>
> \def\startframedtext
> {\dosingleempty\dostartframedtext}
>
> \def\stopframedtext{\dostopframedtext}
Take a look into core-rul.tex,
\startframedtext is a short form for \dostartframedtext[framedtext]
and \starttest for \dostartframedtext[test].
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-21 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-21 3:09 Aditya Mahajan
2008-02-21 8:19 ` Wolfgang Schuster [this message]
2008-02-21 14:01 ` Aditya Mahajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=115224fb0802210019k4302ef5cl11d86d520d2f00cd@mail.gmail.com \
--to=schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).