From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/43587 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Wolfgang Schuster" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Feature request: \newitemize or something like this Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:23:42 +0200 Message-ID: <115224fb0809010123l39c29639me51a4239891bffe6@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080827080342.GZ4017@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> <115224fb0808270112o101dc9eaicc063af842b8bd3c@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220257540 20658 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2008 08:25:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 08:25:40 +0000 (UTC) To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Sep 01 10:26:33 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ka4k2-0000eG-Ru for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:26:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA77C1FC91; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:25:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18776-02-10; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:24:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B077D1FBEF; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:24:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC811FBD4 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:24:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18784-01-13 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:23:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com (yx-out-1718.google.com [74.125.44.152]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CD41FC01 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:23:43 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 3so820791yxi.74 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:23:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.151.41.21 with SMTP id t21mr8189009ybj.212.1220257422121; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:23:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.151.103.21 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 01:23:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <115224fb0808270112o101dc9eaicc063af842b8bd3c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:43587 Archived-At: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Marcin Borkowski > wrote: >> Hi there! >> >> I have a feature request (or a question "how to do it";)) concerning >> itemizations. Currently, they are much like LaTeX (say, with the >> enumitem package). I think this is not the best idea. I can hardly >> imagine using more than two levels of itemize in my documents; on the >> other hand, I like to introduce different "kinds" of itemize on the >> _first_ level. Imagine I'm typesetting a paper on mathematics (which >> I'm doing all the time;)). I want another kind of itemize for lists of: >> * equivalent conditions (as in: "the following are equivalent: ..."); >> * statements connected by an "or" clause (as in: "at least one of these >> holds: ..."; >> * statements connected by an "and" clause (as in: "assume that these >> conditions are satisfied: ..."). >> >> What I usually do (in LaTeX) is to define a few environments, like >> "equivenumerate", "orenumerate", "andenumerate" etc., and make them use >> (a), (b), ..., (i), (ii), ..., or (1), (2), ... respectively. This way >> I have a clear visual clue in my papers on what's going where, and on >> the other hand, I separate content and presentation. >> >> Would it be possible in ConTeXt? If yes, how to do this? Maybe it's >> worth mentioning in the new manual? >> >> (As usual, I'll try to post the answer on the wiki when I have some >> spare time!) > > > Take a look at page 20. > > http://wolfgang.schuster.googlepages.com/erlangen.pdf The source is also available: http://wolfgang.schuster.googlepages.com/baytex Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________