From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/11905 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[2]: MikTeX hash size limit ? Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 14:13:12 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <11611422574.20030413141312@iol.it> References: <3E92ECAF.3070203@free.fr> <196571591.20030408193109@iol.it> <3E934E49.9070004@free.fr> <1967061003.20030409162819@iol.it> <3E983C9D.9040203@free.fr> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1050236587 21615 80.91.224.249 (13 Apr 2003 12:23:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 12:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Sun Apr 13 14:23:05 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 194gVl-0005cG-00 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 14:23:05 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024ED10B27; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 14:23:41 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from smtp0.libero.it (smtp0.libero.it [193.70.192.33]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446CE10B23 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 14:17:59 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from [151.29.141.147] (151.29.141.147) by smtp0.libero.it (7.0.012) id 3E9436120014EC2E for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 14:17:59 +0200 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.63 Beta/7) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <3E983C9D.9040203@free.fr> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:11905 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:11905 Saturday, April 12, 2003 Sebastian Rooks wrote: SR> So it does not seem to be my setup. What can I try next ? Am I really SR> the only guy with this problem ? Drats, it looks like the hash size cannot be changed ... I'm discussing this and similar issues with Christian, so I'll forward the problem to him. If everything goes well it should be fixed in the next upgrade. I'll keep you informed. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta