From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/7755 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=5B4=5D=3A_single_sign_=A7?= Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:05:18 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <1168516838.20020422140518@bigfoot.com> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20020416125850.045d76a0@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20020416125850.045d76a0@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20020421012516.03c7a6b8@212.45.58.16> <971471087.20020421114624@bigfoot.com> <87wuv0ps7e.fsf@gundla.ch> Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035398200 21972 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:36:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: "Patrick Gundlach" In-Reply-To: <87wuv0ps7e.fsf@gundla.ch> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:7755 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:7755 Monday, April 22, 2002 Patrick Gundlach wrote: >> HH> what are the official names for \S and \P ? PG> James has mentioned the official postscript names. But.... >> \textsection and \textparagraph PG> what are these? the enco-ec already defines \sectionmark, so we should PG> stick to that one. And the paragraph glyph is not defined anywhere, as PG> far as I can see. I'd rather suggest \textP as opposed to the \P in PG> math mode. But it would be nice if \P worked also in text mode. Those are the names used in LaTeX. LaTeX forms the names of the glyphs from their PostScript name and prefixing them with \text... -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta