ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Uncial LatTeX font
@ 2002-06-24 21:30 Glenn R. Williams
  2002-06-25 19:19 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Glenn R. Williams @ 2002-06-24 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Folks,

I am trying to use the Uncial and Auncial fonts I installed in latex. Is there 
a way I can use them in ConTeXt?  I'm using tetex on a Linux box. 

In LaTeX, I can use them by just using the package:

\usepackage{alluncl}

Thanks,

Glenn
- -- 
Glenn R Williams
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Mathematical theories are the part of science you could continue to do 
if you woke up tomorrow and discovered the universe was gone" 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9F4+Nw/Wcp38R/MkRAiZ3AJ9uJJsl/z8ty5RgEIVNKl7KDift8ACeJ97r
FQV5A1puNx/RmaPoSZ86zCw=
=bMqK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Uncial LatTeX font
  2002-06-24 21:30 Uncial LatTeX font Glenn R. Williams
@ 2002-06-25 19:19 ` Hans Hagen
  2002-06-26 14:33   ` Glenn R. Williams
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2002-06-25 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: ConTeXt Mailing List

At 05:30 PM 6/24/2002 -0400, Glenn R. Williams wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hi Folks,
>
>I am trying to use the Uncial and Auncial fonts I installed in latex. Is 
>there
>a way I can use them in ConTeXt?  I'm using tetex on a Linux box.
>
>In LaTeX, I can use them by just using the package:
>
>\usepackage{alluncl}

are these fonts on tex live?

Hans

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl
                       Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
                     documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Uncial LatTeX font
  2002-06-25 19:19 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2002-06-26 14:33   ` Glenn R. Williams
  2002-06-26 21:52     ` Bug in bTABLE? Glenn R. Williams
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Glenn R. Williams @ 2002-06-26 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 25 June 2002 03:19 pm, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> are these fonts on tex live?
>
> Hans
>

I don't know, I got them from CTAN. They work fine in LaTeX...

Glenn

- -- 
Glenn R Williams
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Mathematical theories are the part of science you could continue to do 
if you woke up tomorrow and discovered the universe was gone" 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9GdCpw/Wcp38R/MkRAnXtAKCNEklG4nbIwf/GAm/AnvyqeaxhbgCeO5AE
HIFBO9yiXSgnKo90qvmLBXE=
=V/d7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Bug in bTABLE?
  2002-06-26 14:33   ` Glenn R. Williams
@ 2002-06-26 21:52     ` Glenn R. Williams
  2002-06-26 22:52       ` Duncan Hothersall
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Glenn R. Williams @ 2002-06-26 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi All,

I found a curious problem in bTABLE. It seems that the alignment paramter on 
bTD is backwards: specifying "left" gives a column as right-aligned, and 
"align=right" gives you left alignment. Here's the snippet:

\setupTABLE[y][first][width=.2\textwidth,background=color,backgroundcolor=gray]
\bTABLE
  \bTR 
    \bTD {\bf emplid:emplid}             \eTD
    \bTD {\bf dept:deptno}               \eTD
    \bTD[align=left] {\bf salary:float}  \eTD
  \eTR
  \bTR 
    \bTD 02934                             \eTD
    \bTD accounting                      \eTD
    \bTD[align=left] 60000               \eTD 
  \eTR
\eTABLE

Has anyone else had this problem?

Regards,

Glenn
- -- 
Glenn R Williams
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Mathematical theories are the part of science you could continue to do 
if you woke up tomorrow and discovered the universe was gone" 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9Gje0w/Wcp38R/MkRAr97AKCI53gTWZdr1KL9rQTadGkljZpZcQCfcFUG
q9xWv7qq49gJpWJIsGvx2yE=
=cHHk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Bug in bTABLE?
  2002-06-26 21:52     ` Bug in bTABLE? Glenn R. Williams
@ 2002-06-26 22:52       ` Duncan Hothersall
  2002-06-27 22:44         ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Duncan Hothersall @ 2002-06-26 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)


On Wednesday 26 Jun 2002 10:52 pm, Glenn R. Williams wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I found a curious problem in bTABLE. It seems that the alignment paramter
> on bTD is backwards: specifying "left" gives a column as right-aligned, and
> "align=right" gives you left alignment. 

As far as I recall this is a feature, not a bug. It's just that "right" is 
actually shorthand for "raggedright" (and "left" similarly). Slightly 
confusing, at least the first time you see it, but it does make a certain 
amount of sense. 

dh


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re[2]: Bug in bTABLE?
  2002-06-26 22:52       ` Duncan Hothersall
@ 2002-06-27 22:44         ` Giuseppe Bilotta
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Bilotta @ 2002-06-27 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: ntg-context

Thursday, June 27, 2002 Duncan Hothersall wrote:

DH> On Wednesday 26 Jun 2002 10:52 pm, Glenn R. Williams wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I found a curious problem in bTABLE. It seems that the alignment paramter
>> on bTD is backwards: specifying "left" gives a column as right-aligned, and
>> "align=right" gives you left alignment. 

DH> As far as I recall this is a feature, not a bug. It's just that "right" is 
DH> actually shorthand for "raggedright" (and "left" similarly). Slightly 
DH> confusing, at least the first time you see it, but it does make a certain 
DH> amount of sense. 

IIRC there is a hidden switch which will make the left and right
options work the "expected" way. Except I don't remember which is
it ...

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-27 22:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-24 21:30 Uncial LatTeX font Glenn R. Williams
2002-06-25 19:19 ` Hans Hagen
2002-06-26 14:33   ` Glenn R. Williams
2002-06-26 21:52     ` Bug in bTABLE? Glenn R. Williams
2002-06-26 22:52       ` Duncan Hothersall
2002-06-27 22:44         ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).