* Re: [dev-context] Error while updating to new beta
2012-10-16 9:37 ` [dev-context] Error while updating to new beta Hans Hagen
@ 2012-10-16 9:54 ` luigi scarso
2012-10-16 12:12 ` Aditya Mahajan
2012-11-06 21:04 ` [dev-context] " Andre Caldas
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: luigi scarso @ 2012-10-16 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 296 bytes --]
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:
> On 16-10-2012 00:14, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> Same error. But if I comment the definition of
>> resolvers.prefixes.toppath, the error goes away.
>>
>
> fixed (tested on opensuse and ubuntu)
>
>
> Hans
>
confirmed
--
luigi
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 740 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 485 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Error while updating to new beta
2012-10-16 9:37 ` [dev-context] Error while updating to new beta Hans Hagen
2012-10-16 9:54 ` luigi scarso
@ 2012-10-16 12:12 ` Aditya Mahajan
2012-11-06 21:04 ` [dev-context] " Andre Caldas
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2012-10-16 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans Hagen; +Cc: dev-context, mailing list for ConTeXt users
On 2012-10-16, at 5:37 AM, Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:
> On 16-10-2012 00:14, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>> Same error. But if I comment the definition of
>> resolvers.prefixes.toppath, the error goes away.
>
> fixed (tested on opensuse and ubuntu)
>
Thanks. The format is made cleanly now.
Aditya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dev-context] Error while updating to new beta
2012-10-16 9:37 ` [dev-context] Error while updating to new beta Hans Hagen
2012-10-16 9:54 ` luigi scarso
2012-10-16 12:12 ` Aditya Mahajan
@ 2012-11-06 21:04 ` Andre Caldas
2012-11-06 22:32 ` Hans Hagen
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andre Caldas @ 2012-11-06 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users; +Cc: dev-context
>> Same error. But if I comment the definition of
>> resolvers.prefixes.toppath, the error goes away.
>
> fixed (tested on opensuse and ubuntu)
The problem was that in some places there was a
toppath with double "p" (pp)
and in some places it was
topath with single "p" (p).
Will "toppath" be brought back?
Cheers,
André Caldas.
--
- Por que altera a ordem natural da conversação!
- Por que não?
- Eu não gosto, não.
- Você gosta quando copiam a mensagem original ao final do e-mail?
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dev-context] Error while updating to new beta
2012-11-06 21:04 ` [dev-context] " Andre Caldas
@ 2012-11-06 22:32 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2012-11-06 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users; +Cc: dev-context
On 11/6/2012 10:04 PM, Andre Caldas wrote:
>>> Same error. But if I comment the definition of
>>> resolvers.prefixes.toppath, the error goes away.
>>
>> fixed (tested on opensuse and ubuntu)
>
> The problem was that in some places there was a
> toppath with double "p" (pp)
> and in some places it was
> topath with single "p" (p).
>
> Will "toppath" be brought back?
in only see double p's
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread