From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/38734 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: morgan.brassel@free.fr Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Superscript text size Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:14:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1200921285.47949ac5a8326@imp.free.fr> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200926648 17844 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2008 14:44:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:44:08 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Jan 21 15:44:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JGxsw-0005CF-1L for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:44:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7ED1FC7C; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:43:44 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18432-03-3; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:43:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5603D1FB9F; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:42:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA461FB74 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:42:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17111-07-4 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:42:10 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (smtp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.36]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3379C1FCDB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:14:46 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B345FEAF for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:14:45 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from imp4-g19.free.fr (imp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49D55FE41 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:14:45 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by imp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id DA68111B1; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:14:45 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from pas38-3-82-226-102-214.fbx.proxad.net (pas38-3-82-226-102-214.fbx.proxad.net [82.226.102.214]) by imp.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:14:45 +0100 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8 X-Originating-IP: 82.226.102.214 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:38734 Archived-At: Hi, The superscript in expressions like $R^N$ seems to be typeset with a bigger font size in ConTeXt than in LaTeX. Is it the wanted behaviour? From the typographic point of view, which is the best of the two renderings? Thanks for your advice, Morgan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________