From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/38876 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: morgan.brassel@free.fr Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Need of a new global option for indenting? Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1201721522.47a0d0b20a7f4@imp.free.fr> References: <1201717896.47a0c288302e7@imp.free.fr> <47A0C7A8.70201@elvenkind.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201721628 18183 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2008 19:33:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:33:48 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Jan 30 20:34:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JKIh1-0008Cv-Hv for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:33:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBFB1FBC1; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:33:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32160-03-5; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353931FB71; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EEC1FB5A for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:48 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32160-03-4 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (smtp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.36]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB00F1FB71 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30B95FEB4 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:10 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from imp4-g19.free.fr (imp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28975FEEE for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:09 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by imp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id AB4A912E4; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from pas38-3-82-226-102-214.fbx.proxad.net (pas38-3-82-226-102-214.fbx.proxad.net [82.226.102.214]) by imp.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:32:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <47A0C7A8.70201@elvenkind.com> User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8 X-Originating-IP: 82.226.102.214 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:38876 Archived-At: Selon Taco Hoekwater : > morgan.brassel@free.fr wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sorry to bother you with this question again, but I didn't get any > definitive > > answer in the previous discussion: wouldn't it be useful to have a new > option in > > \setupindenting that indents EVERY paragraph? I mean even after floats, > > formulae, heads, etc. > > > > This is a french typographical tradition thing, isn't it? Yes, indeed. But it might be useful to non french people too, I think. > > > It would be easier than to set every 'indentnext' option to 'yes'. My first > > thought was that it should be the role of the 'always' option. Is it silly? > > In fact there is a common entry point for indentnext already, and > redefining that woudl do what you want, I believe: > > \def\checknextindentation[#1]% original > {\processaction > [#1] > [yes=>\doindentation, > no=>\noindentation, > auto=>\autoindentation]} > > \def\checknextindentation[#1]{\doindentation} % redefined Thank you for this trick! > > Hooking into \setupindenting may not be the best idea, because of > backward compatibility. If Hans not feel like adding an extra > inferface, my next proposal would be to add this redefined command > to the t-french module on the garden > > http://modules.contextgarden.net/t-french I understand the problem of backward compatibility, and in this regard, it seems difficult to modify the 'always' option. But what about adding a completely new option? As this might be helpful to non french people too, modifying the t-french module only would be a pity (according to me, of course). > > Best wishes, > Taco > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the > Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________