From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/63678 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Menzel Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Gnuplot module: Patching of Gnuplot binary still needed? Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:28:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1290104899.3755.1.camel@mattotaupa> References: <1289772254.13580.44.camel@mattotaupa> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0263777443==" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290104933 20379 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2010 18:28:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:28:53 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Nov 18 19:28:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJ9Dt-0001mB-Ef for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:28:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669EBCA860; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:28:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id r-Aj7prEA6yQ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:28:36 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7A7CA852; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:28:36 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC56CA852 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:28:34 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id p3yiSf5SzzhW for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:28:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter4-nij.mf.surf.net (filter4-nij.mf.surf.net [195.169.124.155]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766E7CA851 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:28:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.gw90.de (mail.gw90.de [188.40.100.199]) by filter4-nij.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id oAIISLnP002634 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:28:22 +0100 Original-Received: from f053032179.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.53.32.179] helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mail.gw90.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJ9DZ-0002th-EL for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:28:21 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=188.40.100.199; country=DE; latitude=51.0000; longitude=9.0000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=51.0000,9.0000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 04DwGsm5k - 49c0a80443d8 - 20101118 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 195.169.124.155 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:63678 Archived-At: --===============0263777443== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9rJGdtTFukX2aaZ5kWK3" --=-9rJGdtTFukX2aaZ5kWK3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Montag, den 15.11.2010, 12:29 +0100 schrieb Mojca Miklavec: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 23:04, Paul Menzel wrote: > > I read about the Gnuplot module [1] and I am wondering whether patching > > the Gnuplot binary is still necessary. >=20 > Yes. >=20 > Can you please send the same message to the gnuplot mailing list? I will. > I have sent the patch upstream once in 2006, Could you please tell me subject line or even better provide a link to the archive. I could not find your post to the archive. > but they had two arguments against including the patch: [=E2=80=A6] Thanks, Paul --=-9rJGdtTFukX2aaZ5kWK3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkzlcD4ACgkQPX1aK2wOHVhIAwCePWZBg1FmS5PcXEhhYB1VbzAP Y0wAn1OnmAKuBqXw4MSGnzaahaB1/oaF =ivE+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9rJGdtTFukX2aaZ5kWK3-- --===============0263777443== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ --===============0263777443==--