From: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: AMSTeX compatibility: `\dotsb` is not defined
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 12:49:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304506191.4127.79.camel@mattotaupa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74D0A5DD-8AF9-4DD1-872E-693DFAAB12F0@googlemail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 817 bytes --]
Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2011, 22:25 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
> Am 03.05.2011 um 15:46 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> > `\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
>
> Why don’t you use \cdots, i can see no difference between your linked example and mine below.
>
> \setupbodyfont[pagella]
> \starttext
> \formula{A_1+\cdots+A_N}\par
> \formula{A_1+⋯+A_N}
> \stoptext
That is correct.
I think the AMS introduced `\dotsb` to separate the content and the
markup, since some publishers use the lower dots »…« and not the
centered ones »⋯« between operators. So `\dotsb` could just be
redefined.
Additionally amsmath defines it and to be compatible ConTeXt could
define it too.
Aditya more or less wrote the same in here response.
Thanks,
Paul
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 485 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-04 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-03 13:46 Paul Menzel
2011-05-03 20:25 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2011-05-04 10:49 ` Paul Menzel [this message]
2011-05-04 3:54 ` Aditya Mahajan
2011-05-04 10:52 ` Paul Menzel
2011-05-04 11:42 ` Hans Hagen
2011-05-09 20:47 ` Aditya Mahajan
2011-05-09 21:13 ` Paul Menzel
2011-05-09 22:27 ` Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304506191.4127.79.camel@mattotaupa \
--to=paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).