Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2011, 23:54 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> On Tue, 3 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:

> > `\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
> >
> > Is `\dotsb` not defined intentionally?
> 
> I do not completely understand why this command is needed. I think that 
> the intent of amstex is that the user should use \dotsb for dots between 
> binary operators and then change \dotsb to \cdots or \ldots depending on 
> convention. If so, we need to add them to \setupmathematics or perhaps add 
> a new command
> 
> \setupmathdots[binary=middle,comma=low,...and others...]
> 
> or something similar.

I think the question is the following. Does ConTeXt want to define all
commands amstex/amsmath defines?


Thanks,

Paul