Am Sonntag, den 11.12.2011, 13:28 +0100 schrieb Philipp A.:
> apart from this IMHO very useful change (mapping  to \int), maybe we should
> create a unicode-math module which replaces some commands with symbols.

Do you mean symbols by commands?

> i find myself always using this for chemical and mathematical documents:
> 
> \catcode`→=\active
> \def→{\xrightarrow}
> \catcode`↔=\active
> \def↔{\xleftrightarrow}
> \catcode`√=\active
> \def√{\sqrt}

Sorry for being a noob. I thought for the first three that is somehow
done already. If not, such a mechanism would indeed be useful.

> PS: i recently posted two questions to this list which i got no
> replies to:“simplefonts: math in headers” and“headers:
> numberconversion=something or \definestructureconversionset”
> 
> do you see them or did they get lost in transmission?

The message were delivered to the subscribers. You can also check that
in the archive [1]. We just have to be patient. I hope Wolfgang is not
sick/ill and is doing fine by being on vacation or something similar.

PPS: Do you also use the Neo layout [4]?


[1] http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2011/thread.html
[2] http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2011/063723.html
[3] http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2011/063739.html
[4] http://neo-layout.org/