On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 11:44 +0900, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> Actually Vladimir, Vlad is usually used as short for Vladislav.

Except in the case of my buddy Vlad(imir) here in Vancouver ;)

> >> (not an expert, just read command reference)
> >>> (1) What is the difference between \definedescription and
> >>> \setupdescriptions?
> >> the first should define new "description", the second change style of
> >> already defined "description".
> 
> > Ah, so \setupdescriptions inherits the default values of
> > \definedescription?
> 
> I suppose no, '\define...', eh-m, defines a command while '\setup...', eh-m,
> sets up its 'style'. When one defines a command one could set its
> custom 'style' instead of default.
> 
> Consider the following example:
> <example file="ex1.tex">
> \starttext
> 
> \definedescription[definition]

Why is this above command necessary? Why can one not simply begin with
the next one, \definition{Hi}?

> \definition{Hi} This is first definition.

> May be because this is an example? I would say that ConTeX User Manual
> shows different commands from context itself and how one could define
> custom commands. The '\definition' is one them.

???

> I don't know but reading manuals (context and latex ones), wiki and etc
> somehow convince me that 'head' relates with section heading (styling),
> for the rest there are '\setup...' commands and 'headstyle' key (not
> always, of course), may be that's why I always consult reference on wiki
> and sometimes source code.

It's kind of inconsistent that it isn't using a \setuphead, but I
suppose it doesn't matter now as I got the desired effect =)

Thanks Vladimir =)

-- 
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
http://www.thevertigo.com