From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/74755 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kip Warner Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Scribus vs ConTeXt Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:34:07 -0800 Message-ID: <1330457647.2820.77.camel@kip-laptop> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1267411169==" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330457668 18612 80.91.229.3 (28 Feb 2012 19:34:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:34:28 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Feb 28 20:34:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S2Soc-0001XI-KY for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:34:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E49CCB263; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:34:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zBDZERD262KX; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:34:20 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6E5CB25B; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:34:20 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06F3CB25B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:34:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id johxzcq7a1-6 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:34:16 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter1-til.mf.surf.net (filter1-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.217]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E73CB227 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:34:16 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from homiemail-a59.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by filter1-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q1SJYDkc022609 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:34:14 +0100 Original-Received: from homiemail-a59.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a59.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C06B56405C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:34:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=thevertigo.com; h=subject:from:to :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version; q=dns; s= thevertigo.com; b=nONut5ic6PWlar4INavuP/5sy8XpZWBLqpnJEK/nvb17C3 B+vf1frSYS9RJgdQIqkrCYkHW4MbUAFJjggFXbzwGSvWq2OMrQrpfrZCV12yYI1m LNPgEePmIMaQ7j+DYPjY7M/DDKB8XxGsL0XUA7ujrlbPXP8Qslsw7eBZXnPa8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thevertigo.com; h=subject :from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version; s= thevertigo.com; bh=Rj/H0JJ+N6Qp4FckrD+vfHsaHbM=; b=bflKuz0OHdKmF m+gOVp7fmOXquZbts4wUkP+48LDLnX9f6sPM1Vkif+Ptkl6h5r/SN+r87UYDMDAO eWuqOZWdSu0B+tkaVhk7qv33/qw5QkmjC52O+bDo7wc3bmV8xCxCJnSlF6JBT4Ay NpkAbuQCmmtUoVENJ02ESZykf1BVgc= Original-Received: from [192.168.1.64] (76-10-184-87.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.184.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kip@thevertigo.com) by homiemail-a59.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA98A564059 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:34:10 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=208.113.200.5; country=US; region=CA; city=Brea; postalcode=92821; latitude=33.9269; longitude=-117.8612; metrocode=803; areacode=714; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=33.9269,-117.8612&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0RGDvyeh6 - 41fa53c2f784 - 20120228 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.217 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:74755 Archived-At: --===============1267411169== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SFYIkFifXQq6a6i/UdbA" --=-SFYIkFifXQq6a6i/UdbA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey folks, I was wondering if someone could offer a meaningful comparison in a nutshell to a layperson of the pros and cons of using Scribus versus ConTeXt. I actually just discovered the former today. --=20 Kip Warner -- Software Engineer OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred http://www.thevertigo.com --=-SFYIkFifXQq6a6i/UdbA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk9NLC8ACgkQLXnfK7bii20JQACgn2NSSrYa/eBE54J5B05qzt4P hyoAnAq1AwdY/WVBSR3YjHAbKndSQjWe =dH3C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SFYIkFifXQq6a6i/UdbA-- --===============1267411169== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ --===============1267411169==--