Re: Re[3]: In-paragraph display

["Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@fastmail.fm>]

On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 07:37 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:

> HH> hm, but it's not the writer who's in charge here, but the 
> designer; so, in
> HH> terms of intentional coding, one should code in such a way that 
> whatever
> HH> strange thing happens along the road (accidental empty line or 
> not) the
> HH> output is consistent. So, an in-par something should be coded as 
> such so
> HH> that the environment can handle it, as good as possible.
>
> This is where we differ. After all, the empty line is the
> *standard* TeX (and ConTeXt) way to denote new paragraph. While
> should it be different for displayed items? It's inconsistent.

For what it's worth, I agree with Giuseppe here.   It's the same issue 
I had with block quotes: that even if there's no blank line, ConTeXt  
assumes new paragraph.

--
Dr. Bruce D'Arcus
Miami University
Geography Department
216 Shideler Hall
Oxford, OH 45056