From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9985 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Bruce D'Arcus" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re[3]: In-paragraph display Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:18:06 -0500 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <13EC3A06-065D-11D7-B956-0030657A7050@fastmail.fm> References: <532276393.20021203013702@iol.it> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1038878252 24162 80.91.224.249 (3 Dec 2002 01:17:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 01:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18J1go-0006Ha-00 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 02:17:30 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E506210AE6; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 02:19:48 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from muaix02.mcs.muohio.edu (muaix02.mcs.muohio.edu [134.53.253.22]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0E410ABF for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 02:18:46 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from muwnt05 (muwnt05.mcs.muohio.edu [134.53.7.75]) by muaix02.mcs.muohio.edu (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with SMTP id gB31IiI163054 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:18:44 -0500 Original-Received: From mcsaix05.mcs.muohio.edu ([134.53.253.27]) by muwnt05 (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 1038878323934; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:18:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fastmail.fm (ip134-053-112-238.s112.muohio.edu [134.53.112.238]) by mcsaix05.mcs.muohio.edu (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id gB31Ihw183532 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:18:43 -0500 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <532276393.20021203013702@iol.it> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9985 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9985 On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 07:37 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > HH> hm, but it's not the writer who's in charge here, but the > designer; so, in > HH> terms of intentional coding, one should code in such a way that > whatever > HH> strange thing happens along the road (accidental empty line or > not) the > HH> output is consistent. So, an in-par something should be coded as > such so > HH> that the environment can handle it, as good as possible. > > This is where we differ. After all, the empty line is the > *standard* TeX (and ConTeXt) way to denote new paragraph. While > should it be different for displayed items? It's inconsistent. For what it's worth, I agree with Giuseppe here. It's the same issue I had with block quotes: that even if there's no blank line, ConTeXt assumes new paragraph. -- Dr. Bruce D'Arcus Miami University Geography Department 216 Shideler Hall Oxford, OH 45056