From: "Saša Janiška" <gour@atmarama.com>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: ConTeXt vs Beamer
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:16:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453803397.2301.23.camel@atmarama.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mvrtbbsy.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
On Pon, 2016-01-25 at 22:15 +0100, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> I used ConTeXt once for a presentation, and then came back to Beamer.
> Not necessarily because it's better, but I know it quite well, so
> I could prepare my slides faster.
Hmm, that's valid point.
> So I don't have a lot of experience with ConTeXt, but I'll risk an
> opinion: if you're fine with a simple presentation without much
> learning, or more learning for a sophisticated presentation, consider
> ConTeXt. If you don't mind a bit boring look (which some consider an
> advantage) and/or you want just to copy a template from the docs (even
> for a bit more sophisticated stuff), try Beamer.
Thank you for sharing.
> Also, you might want to switch to a decent text editor. ;-P
I tried twice, but after noticing wrist pain, I said: "Goodbye!". ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Even the intelligent are bewildered in determining what is action
and what is inaction. Now I shall explain to you what action is,
knowing which you shall be liberated from all misfortune.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-26 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 20:11 Saša Janiška
2016-01-25 20:55 ` Alan BRASLAU
2016-01-25 21:15 ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-01-26 10:16 ` Saša Janiška [this message]
2016-01-26 8:56 ` Hans Hagen
2016-01-26 11:00 ` Saša Janiška
2016-01-26 10:11 ` Saša Janiška
2016-01-25 21:56 ` Otared Kavian
2016-01-26 11:04 ` Saša Janiška
2016-01-26 7:34 ` Jan U. Hasecke
2016-01-26 8:57 ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-02-02 9:03 ` Saša Janiška
2016-01-26 10:22 ` Saša Janiška
2016-01-26 11:22 ` Jan U. Hasecke
2016-01-26 14:17 ` Aditya Mahajan
2016-01-26 15:37 Jeong Dal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1453803397.2301.23.camel@atmarama.com \
--to=gour@atmarama.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).