From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9989 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[6]: In-paragraph display Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:12:58 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <1547767058.20021203121258@iol.it> References: <13EC3A06-065D-11D7-B956-0030657A7050@fastmail.fm> <13EC3A06-065D-11D7-B956-0030657A7050@fastmail.fm> <5.1.0.14.1.20021203113956.03313b40@server-1> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1038913948 21835 80.91.224.249 (3 Dec 2002 11:12:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18JAyX-0005fy-00 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:12:25 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D4210AEF; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:14:42 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mbox.dmi.unict.it (mbox.dmi.unict.it [151.97.252.66]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C96310AE8 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:13:16 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from OBLOMOV.mshome.net (oblomov.dipmat.unict.it [151.97.252.27]) by mbox.dmi.unict.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A32C6F33 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:06:48 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62 Beta/17) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20021203113956.03313b40@server-1> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9989 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9989 Tuesday, December 3, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote: HH> now, say that there will be: HH> (1) quotation HH> (2) blockquotation HH> with HH> (1) forcing a new par HH> (2) behaving the way you want HH> and both can be set up as usual to act differently, that would solve the HH> problem, wouldn't it, since you could either setup up quotation differently HH> or use blockquotation. (i'm not going to change the quotation defaults, HH> simply because it would break compatibility) That's fine for me. But wow would this differ from having the possibility to set quotation (and other displayed environments) to not force new paragraphs? After all, a blockquotation can easily be tuned to force new paragraphs (just but before=\par and after=\par), but the converse is not true. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta