From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/11894 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[4]: Backgrounds Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:15:15 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <15933443799.20030411191515@iol.it> References: <5.2.0.9.1.20030410215807.014f3880@localhost> <871y0biuyd.fsf@gundla.ch> <5.1.0.14.1.20030325094633.031a8c80@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20030325094633.031a8c80@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20030325131938.01d9af40@server-1> <9619582618.20030325153623@iol.it> <871y0biuyd.fsf@gundla.ch> <5.2.0.9.1.20030410215807.014f3880@localhost> <5.2.0.9.1.20030411180118.016c46e8@server-1> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1050081508 28672 80.91.224.249 (11 Apr 2003 17:18:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 17:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Fri Apr 11 19:18:27 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1942A5-0007QT-00 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:18:01 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0735A10B10; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:18:34 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from smtp2.libero.it (smtp2.libero.it [193.70.192.52]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C61910AEC for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:15:27 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from [151.29.130.92] (151.29.130.92) by smtp2.libero.it (6.7.015) id 3E90B39B0020BA32 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:15:27 +0200 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.63 Beta/7) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.1.20030411180118.016c46e8@server-1> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:11894 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:11894 Friday, April 11, 2003 Hans Hagen wrote: >>I think I see; instead of drawing only the needed parts you draw >>the whole frame and then cut the unwanted parts off. Is this more >>efficient than drawing only the needed parts? HH> simplier, less error prone, less code, more educative ... Fine :) >>And what about the way to determine when there is a split or not? >>Could you please put a boolean that reveals it, in the next beta? >>(even if I'm still convinced that using a multilocs of 0 would be >>enough ... ok, it would break backwards compatibility, but how >>many people are using this mechanism already?) HH> hm, but as a heavy context user i count myself as 2048 users so ... ROTFL :) OK, it's 2048 users to 2, but then again in how many places do you make use of the multilocs being 1 when unsplit? :) But then, a boolean could suffice; is there hope to see it in the next beta? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta