From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/17174 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[2]: \mathstrut in \underbrace and nath Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:35:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1638455890.20041120123530@iol.it> References: <20041117160050.GE8954@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> <179845091.20041118163421@iol.it> <20041118185157.GN9088@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> <419E0D52.10701@creutzig.de> <419E1365.3000104@wxs.nl> <20041119171650.GB9509@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> <892377887.20041119185344@iol.it> <419E6F3C.70705@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100950636 7079 80.91.229.6 (20 Nov 2004 11:37:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 11:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Nov 20 12:37:04 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CVTY8-0000Eq-00 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:37:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE5D12792; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:37:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29128-02; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:37:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4099412793; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:37:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5ED12793 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:37:00 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29168-01 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:36:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp2.libero.it (unknown [193.70.192.52]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D6C12792 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:36:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (172.16.1.79) by smtp2.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 40C7347602373FC3 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:37:28 +0100 Original-Received: from OBLOMOV (151.44.176.200) by smtp20.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 40E3F8E20550FA6E for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:36:59 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <419E6F3C.70705@wxs.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at libero.it serv1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:17174 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:17174 Friday, November 19, 2004 h h extern wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> Shall this go in nath? Or, Hans, will you protect those macros? > if so, i need to protect the lot, any system/logic behind what to protect ? I have no idea. Everything? What's the downside of protecting a macro? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta