* [NTG-context] A math question
@ 2002-10-18 21:51 Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-10-18 21:59 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Bilotta @ 2002-10-18 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello,
does ConTeXt provide extensible arrows with super and subscript?
An extensible arrow is something like \leftarrow, \rightarrow,
\Leftarrow, \Rightarrow, except that it accepts super/subscripts
which gets typeset over or under the arrow body, which extends to
accomdate the length of the super and subscripts (with a minimum
guaranteed legth).
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl
http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [NTG-context] A math question
2002-10-18 21:51 [NTG-context] A math question Giuseppe Bilotta
@ 2002-10-18 21:59 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Bilotta @ 2002-10-18 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ntg-context
Friday, October 18, 2002 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
GB> Hello,
GB> does ConTeXt provide extensible arrows with super and subscript?
GB> An extensible arrow is something like \leftarrow, \rightarrow,
GB> \Leftarrow, \Rightarrow, except that it accepts super/subscripts
GB> which gets typeset over or under the arrow body, which extends to
GB> accomdate the length of the super and subscripts (with a minimum
GB> guaranteed legth).
Sorry for following up to my own post, but I found a couple of
definitions in nath.sty (Nath is a wonderful LaTeX package) which
might be pertinent:
GB> %
GB> % E x p a n d a b l e h o r i z o n t a l a r r o w s
GB> %
GB>
GB> \def\longrightarrow@#1#2{\mathrel{\mathopen-\axis@@
GB> \axis@{#1}{#2}
GB> \axis@@\mathclose\rightarrow}}
GB>
GB> \def\longleftarrow@#1#2{\mathrel{\mathopen\leftarrow\axis@@
GB> \axis@{#1}{#2}
GB> \axis@@\mathclose-}}
GB>
GB> \def\longleftrightarrow@#1#2{\mathrel{\mathopen\leftarrow\axis@@
GB> \axis@{#1}{#2}
GB> \axis@@\mathclose\rightarrow}}
GB>
GB> \pdef\to{\def\afterparse@{
GB> \longrightarrow@{\ifsp@\sp@toks@\fi}{\ifsb@\sb@toks@\fi}\next}
GB> \sb@false\sp@false
GB> \def\next@comm{\afterassignment\parse@next\let\next=}
GB> \next@comm}
GB>
GB> \pdef\ot{\def\afterparse@{
GB> \longleftarrow@{\ifsp@\sp@toks@\fi}{\ifsb@\sb@toks@\fi}\next}
GB> \sb@false\sp@false
GB> \def\next@comm{\afterassignment\parse@next\let\next=}
GB> \next@comm}
GB>
GB> \pdef\otto{\def\afterparse@{
GB> \longleftrightarrow@{\ifsp@\sp@toks@\fi}{\ifsb@\sb@toks@\fi}\next}
GB> \sb@false\sp@false
GB> \def\next@comm{\afterassignment\parse@next\let\next=}
GB> \next@comm}
GB>
GB> \pdef\mapsto{\mathrel{\mapstochar}\mathclose{}\mathopen{}\to}
GB>
GB> \def\sp@toks@{\edef\@tempa{\noexpand\inline{\the\sp@toks}}\@tempa}
GB> \def\sb@toks@{\edef\@tempa{\noexpand\inline{\the\sb@toks}}\@tempa}
GB>
GB> \def\axis@#1#2{\setbox0\scriptstylehbox@{\protectinline@true #1}
GB> \er@wd=\wd0
GB> \setbox\@tempboxa\scriptstylehbox@{\protectinline@true #2}
GB> \ifdim\wd\@tempboxa>\er@wd \er@wd=\wd\@tempboxa\fi
GB> \@tempdima=\ht\@tempboxa
GB> \advance\@tempdima\dp\@tempboxa
GB> \advance\@tempdima-.42\mex
GB> \vtop{\offinterlineskip
GB> \hbox{\vbox{\hbox to\er@wd{\hss\box0\hss}%
GB> \vskip -.26\mex
GB> \hbox to\er@wd{\axis@@@\hfill}}}
GB> \vskip -.26\mex
GB> \hbox to\er@wd{\hss\box\@tempboxa\hss}}
GB> }
GB>
GB> \def\axis@@{\mkern-6mu
GB> \axis@@@\mskip 3mu plus \arrow@expandability mu
GB> \mkern-6mu}
GB>
GB> \def\axis@@@{%
GB> \cleaders\hbox{\o@math\mkern-3mu \icurrstyle@\mathord- \mkern-3mu\o@math}}
GB>
GB> \def\arrow@expandability{1.2}
GB>
GB> \def\longrightarrowfill{\axis@@@\hfill\mskip-6mu\rightarrow}
GB> \def\longleftarrowfill{\leftarrow\mskip-6mu\axis@@@\hfill}
GB> \def\longleftrightarrowfill{\leftarrow\mskip-6mu
GB> \axis@@@\hfill\mskip-6mu\rightarrow}
It is my understanding that this shouldn't be too hard to port to
contest: \o@math is simply the "original" TeX $, the afterparse@,
\ifsp@, \ifsb@ do a lookahead to see if superscripts and
subscripts are used, and in case use them.
Would it be hard to port this to ConTeXt?
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl
http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-18 21:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-18 21:51 [NTG-context] A math question Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-10-18 21:59 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).