From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/6857 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Incomplete style switch Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:51:03 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <16715699.20020207215103@bigfoot.com> Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035397362 14356 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:22:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:6857 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:6857 Hello, try the following text: \starttext \definelabel[parnumber][headstyle=\os,location=inleft] \setupparagraphintro[each][\parnumber] \input tufte \par \input tufte \par \input tufte \par \stoptext Notice that whatever you put in headstyle (\sl, \it, ...) the numbers will come out bold. At first I was surprised, but it didn't take me much to discover that the reason is that inmargins default to a bold style. My question is: is this a bug? Shouldn't the style specified in the label definition take precedence? (i.e. shouldn't it be applied *after* the location style?) -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta