From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/24676 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Arnold Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Answer blocks potential Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:45:47 -0800 Message-ID: <16F95250-022B-4FD0-A91F-1221E088B0D9@cox.net> References: <43AA7C3D.5000606@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135298843 22503 80.91.229.2 (23 Dec 2005 00:47:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Dec 23 01:47:21 2005 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Epb5Q-0000aL-Dk for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:47:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245D712885; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:47:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26420-01-4; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:47:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B55127B8; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:47:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4B7127B8 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:47:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26420-01-3 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:47:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (fed1rmmtao04.cox.net [68.230.241.35]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D05127A1 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:47:00 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [10.0.1.2] (really [70.191.56.23]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051223004508.QGBE17690.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@[10.0.1.2]> for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:45:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43AA7C3D.5000606@wxs.nl> Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:24676 Archived-At: Hans, OK. Meanwhile, looking to a future fromatting of the exercise set, brief solutions, and long solutions, do you think it best that I instruct my colleagues to code in question-answer blocks (LongAnswer, BriefAnswer)? On Dec 22, 2005, at 2:13 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > David Arnold wrote: > >> Hans, Taco, et al, >> >> I've looked at the question-answer block suggestion and it has >> good potential for what I want to do. What I need now is a way >> of typesetting the blocks as follows. >> >> 1. Question 2. Question >> 3. Question 4. Question >> >> Then, later in the document, I'll unhide the answer blocks. >> >> Is it worth my while to try to use question-answer blocks in an >> itemized environment? should I pursue that or try a different tack? > > no. it can only be used at the outer level > > Hans > > _______________________________________________ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context