From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 20885 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2024 22:10:11 -0000 Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (5.39.185.202) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Jan 2024 22:10:11 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3D1483EF6 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 23:06:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8bKYkVqTNYJg for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 23:06:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A81483FD6 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 23:06:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97ED3483B80 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 23:05:16 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rTH4YB1ZLjis for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 23:05:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A66483B7E for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 23:05:16 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: 111414w@gmail.com To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 22:05:16 -0000 Message-ID: <170475151639.1645.1665703741655488372@cgl.ntg.nl> User-Agent: HyperKitty on http://mailman.ntg.nl/ Message-ID-Hash: Z3LBMQGI4TSHYVG46X4UCSH5BPYYDASY X-Message-ID-Hash: Z3LBMQGI4TSHYVG46X4UCSH5BPYYDASY X-MailFrom: 111414w@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Subject: [NTG-context] Why the way key-value argument is called affected the document's output? List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I was cleaning and formatting my context file and then when I compiled it, the output I got introduced extra vertical spacings at the section headings that weren't there in the previous compilations. I had to spend enormous amount of time trying to fix it so to emulate my previous outputs. Turns out the problem was how I called one of the key-value argument in the document. I really wanna know the reason why it did influenced the output? Provided below is the minimal source code (and it is producing different outputs, meaning the vertical spacings are not same, on my device running the version released in the September and also tested with the latest release.) """ %% differences in outputs, for how "grid=yes" is called. %% Type 1. %\setuplayout[grid=yes] %% Type 2. %\setuplayout[ %grid=yes %] \setuphead[section][grid=low] %% needed to observe the output difference \starttext \title{Alpha} \subsection{Beta} \input{knuth} \stoptext """ Best regards, Ali ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________